Judge Scott Mcafee Federalist Society

Judge Scott McAfee: A Deep Dive into His Association with the Federalist Society

Introduction:

The recent high-profile trial of Alec Baldwin has brought Judge Scott McAfee into the national spotlight. Beyond the courtroom drama, however, lies a deeper question for many: what is Judge Scott McAfee's connection to the Federalist Society, and what implications might that have? This in-depth analysis will explore Judge McAfee's background, his association (or lack thereof) with the Federalist Society, and the broader significance of judicial affiliations with this influential organization. We'll delve into the intricacies of the Federalist Society's ideology, examine potential biases, and consider how these factors might impact judicial decisions. This comprehensive look will provide clarity on this increasingly relevant topic.

Chapter 1: Understanding Judge Scott McAfee's Background

Before examining his potential ties to the Federalist Society, it’s crucial to understand Judge McAfee's judicial career. A detailed examination of his past rulings, legal experience, and judicial philosophy will provide a crucial foundation for analyzing any potential influence exerted by the Federalist Society. This involves looking at his educational background, his career trajectory leading to his current position, and publicly available information regarding his legal philosophy and approach to case law. Exploring his prior rulings on various cases will highlight his judicial temperament and consistent application of the law.

Chapter 2: The Federalist Society: Ideology and Influence

The Federalist Society is a prominent conservative legal organization with a significant influence on the American legal landscape. This chapter will analyze the organization’s core tenets, its network of influential members, and the methods it employs to shape legal discourse and judicial appointments. Understanding the Federalist Society's ideology, including its emphasis on originalism, textualism, and limited government, is critical to assessing its potential influence on judges. Examining its role in shaping legal scholarship and advocating for specific judicial appointments will shed light on its broader impact.

Chapter 3: Dissecting Judge Scott McAfee's Potential Connection to the Federalist Society

This chapter will directly address the central question: What is Judge Scott McAfee’s documented association with the Federalist Society? We’ll analyze publicly available information such as court records, news articles, and the Federalist Society’s own website to determine the nature and extent of any connection. This involves verifying any membership, involvement in events, or endorsement by the organization. Absence of evidence should be carefully weighed against the possibility of a less formal or undisclosed relationship. The analysis will consider potential conflicts of interest or perceived biases that might arise from such an association.


Chapter 4: The Impact of Judicial Affiliations on Case Outcomes (A Broader Perspective)

The influence of judicial affiliations, regardless of the organization, is a complex topic worthy of in-depth discussion. This chapter will explore the broader debate surrounding judicial impartiality and the role of judicial ideology in shaping legal interpretations. We will analyze several case studies where judicial affiliations with organizations like the Federalist Society have been discussed or debated publicly. This will provide a framework for understanding the potential impact of such affiliations and underscore the importance of judicial independence. This also includes a discussion of ethical considerations and mechanisms designed to ensure fair and unbiased judicial processes.


Chapter 5: Conclusion: Evaluating the Evidence and Implications

This concluding chapter will summarize the findings of the previous chapters, offering a well-supported conclusion on the nature of Judge Scott McAfee’s relationship with the Federalist Society (or the lack thereof). We will reiterate the importance of separating factual findings from speculation and highlight the ongoing debate surrounding judicial affiliations and their influence on legal decisions. We will conclude with a reasoned assessment of the implications of this relationship (or lack thereof) on the perception of fairness and impartiality in the Alec Baldwin trial and beyond.


Article Outline:

Title: Judge Scott McAfee, the Federalist Society, and the Alec Baldwin Trial: An Analysis

Introduction: Hooking the reader with the Alec Baldwin trial and the central question about Judge McAfee's connection to the Federalist Society.
Chapter 1: Judge Scott McAfee's Background: Education, Career, Judicial Philosophy, and Key Rulings.
Chapter 2: The Federalist Society: Ideology, Influence, Methods, and Key Figures.
Chapter 3: Investigating Judge Scott McAfee's Relationship with the Federalist Society: Evidence and Analysis.
Chapter 4: The Broader Impact of Judicial Affiliations on Impartiality and Case Outcomes.
Chapter 5: Conclusion: Summary of Findings, Implications, and Future Considerations.



(Note: The following sections would be expanded to create the full 1500+ word article. This outline provides the structure. Each chapter would be significantly longer and more detailed.)


FAQs:

1. Is Judge Scott McAfee a member of the Federalist Society? This question will be addressed through detailed research and analysis of publicly available information.
2. How does the Federalist Society influence judicial appointments? This will detail the Society's lobbying efforts and involvement in the selection process.
3. What is originalism, and how does it relate to the Federalist Society? A detailed explanation of the legal philosophy and its significance.
4. Could Judge McAfee's potential affiliation bias his rulings? An exploration of the potential for bias and mechanisms to mitigate it.
5. What are some criticisms of the Federalist Society? A balanced presentation of opposing viewpoints.
6. How does judicial impartiality impact public trust in the legal system? A discussion of the importance of public confidence.
7. What other judges have been associated with the Federalist Society? Examples and analysis of their careers.
8. Are there any legal challenges to the influence of organizations like the Federalist Society? Examination of potential legal arguments and precedents.
9. What resources are available to learn more about judicial ethics and impartiality? A list of relevant websites, books, and organizations.


Related Articles:

1. The Federalist Society's Impact on Supreme Court Appointments: Analysis of the Society's role in shaping the composition of the Supreme Court.
2. Originalism vs. Living Constitutionalism: A Debate: An in-depth exploration of competing legal philosophies.
3. Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law: A discussion of the importance of an unbiased judiciary.
4. The Role of Interest Groups in Judicial Selection: Examination of the influence of various organizations on judicial appointments.
5. Ethics in the Judiciary: A Comprehensive Overview: A detailed look at ethical standards for judges.
6. Case Studies of Judicial Bias: Examples of cases where judicial bias has been alleged or proven.
7. The Alec Baldwin Trial: A Legal Analysis: An overview of the trial and its key legal issues.
8. Understanding Judicial Philosophy: A Guide for Non-Lawyers: An accessible explanation of different judicial approaches.
9. The Future of the Federalist Society and its Influence: A prediction of the organization’s trajectory and impact.


(Note: Each related article description above would be expanded for the complete blog post.)


  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Find Me the Votes Michael Isikoff, Daniel Klaidman, 2024-01-30 From veteran award-winning investigative journalists Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman, the epic inside story of the prosecution of a president. In Find Me the Votes, two years of immersive reporting by Isikoff and Klaidman has produced the most authoritative and dramatic account yet of a defeated president’s conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election and how a local Georgia prosecutor—a daughter of the civil rights movement—decided to indict him and his allies for his desperate attempt to hold on to power. From the beginning, Fani Willis saw Donald Trump’s crimes as a voting rights case, and an attempt by the former president to deprive the citizens of Georgia of the franchise, a right for which her forebears had bled. Isikoff and Klaidman take us deep inside both the nerve center of Trump’s effort to steal the election and the DA’s team of prosecutors as they build their case against the president. Their reporting reveals new information on the plot to criminally seize voting equipment in several states; Sidney Powell’s attempt to obtain preemptive pardons from Trump; and revelatory communications between the president and his co-conspirators. We see the prosecution take shape in Willis’s office in the face of heinous threats of violent retaliation from Trump’s supporters. With blockbuster original reporting and exclusive access to thousands of secret documents, emails, text messages, and audio recordings, Find Me the Votes is investigative journalism at its finest. The authors also conducted exclusive interviews with key sources in the Trump conspiracy, as well as with the president’s top targets, including Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger and the Fulton County DA’s team–featuring hours of interviews with Fani Willis herself. This is riveting contemporary history, and a lasting account of the prosecution of a president who tested the rule of law as no president ever had before. Isikoff and Klaidman have written a story for the ages.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Digital Dilemma National Research Council, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure, 2000-02-24 Imagine sending a magazine article to 10 friends-making photocopies, putting them in envelopes, adding postage, and mailing them. Now consider how much easier it is to send that article to those 10 friends as an attachment to e-mail. Or to post the article on your own site on the World Wide Web. The ease of modifying or copying digitized material and the proliferation of computer networking have raised fundamental questions about copyright and patentâ€intellectual property protections rooted in the U.S. Constitution. Hailed for quick and convenient access to a world of material, the Internet also poses serious economic issues for those who create and market that material. If people can so easily send music on the Internet for free, for example, who will pay for music? This book presents the multiple facets of digitized intellectual property, defining terms, identifying key issues, and exploring alternatives. It follows the complex threads of law, business, incentives to creators, the American tradition of access to information, the international context, and the nature of human behavior. Technology is explored for its ability to transfer content and its potential to protect intellectual property rights. The book proposes research and policy recommendations as well as principles for policymaking.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary, 1998
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Legal Design Corrales Compagnucci, Marcelo, Haapio, Helena, Hagan, Margaret, Doherty, Michael, 2021-10-21 This innovative book proposes new theories on how the legal system can be made more comprehensible, usable and empowering for people through the use of design principles. Utilising key case studies and providing real-world examples of legal innovation, the book moves beyond discussion to action. It offers a rich set of examples, demonstrating how various design methods, including information, service, product and policy design, can be leveraged within research and practice.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions , 2005
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: By Popular Demand John Gastil, 2000-08 By Popular Demand tackles two important issues--increasing political participation and restoring trust in government--that are critical to the future of American democracy. John Gastil's careful research makes a solid contribution to the recent literature on the growing divide between the public, elections, and policy decisions. His solutions are worthy of our careful consideration.—Mark Baldassare, author of When Government Fails: The Orange County Bankruptcy (California 1998) and California in the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape (California 2000). In an era of political cynicism, a new movement of citizen empowerment is afoot. Encouraging active involvement through community dialogue and deliberation, advocates of strong democracy are designing innovative processes in which ordinary citizens can work through difficult public issues by constructive and respectful talk. John Gastil's new book By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy by Deliberative Elections is a new landmark work in the literature of politics and communication and should be read by everyone interested in the revitalization of democracy.—Stephen W. Littlejohn, President Public Dialogue Consortium By Popular Demand is a persuasively argued account of the deficiencies of the U.S. electoral system. Gastil provides a wealth of insights into the frequent disconnect between politicians and their constituents. His solution for the ails of popular representation--including on voters' ballots the correspondence between legislators' positions and those of citizen panels--should provoke spirited debate among scholars, journalists, and policymakers alike.—Mark A. Smith, University of Washington John Gastil makes a compelling case for a more deliberative approach to electing officials in the United States. He understands the potential for public deliberation and the barriers to it. Anyone interested in improving the representativeness of the electoral process should take note of this book and its provocative proposal. As Gastil masterfully demonstrates, a deliberative citizenry provides both the knowledge and will required to legitimate democratic governance.—David Mathews, President, Kettering Foundation Hallelujah for John Gastil! He's right on target that citizens must regain their place in our politics and public life. His call to create more places for citizens to talk deeply about their concerns and hopes is one we must all heed.—Richard C. Harwood, Founder and President of The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Law and Macroeconomics Yair Listokin, 2019-03-11 A distinguished Yale economist and legal scholar’s argument that law, of all things, has the potential to rescue us from the next economic crisis. After the economic crisis of 2008, private-sector spending took nearly a decade to recover. Yair Listokin thinks we can respond more quickly to the next meltdown by reviving and refashioning a policy approach whose proven success is too rarely acknowledged. Harking back to New Deal regulatory agencies, Listokin proposes that we take seriously law’s ability to function as a macroeconomic tool, capable of stimulating demand when needed and relieving demand when it threatens to overheat economies. Listokin makes his case by looking at both positive and cautionary examples, going back to the New Deal and including the Keystone Pipeline, the constitutionally fraught bond-buying program unveiled by the European Central Bank at the nadir of the Eurozone crisis, the ongoing Greek crisis, and the experience of U.S. price controls in the 1970s. History has taught us that law is an unwieldy instrument of macroeconomic policy, but Listokin argues that under certain conditions it offers a vital alternative to the monetary and fiscal policy tools that stretch the legitimacy of technocratic central banks near their breaking point while leaving the rest of us waiting and wallowing.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Imperfect Alternatives Neil K. Komesar, 1997-01-15 Major approaches to law and public policy, ranging from law and economics to the fundamental rights approach to constitutional law, are based on the belief that the identification of the correct social goals or values is the key to describing or prescribing law and public policy outcomes. In this book, Neil Komesar argues that this emphasis on goal choice ignores an essential element—institutional choice. Indeed, as important as determining our social goals is deciding which institution is best equipped to implement them—the market, the political process, or the adjucative process. Pointing out that all three institutions are massive, complex, and imperfect, Komesar develops a strategy for comparative institutional analysis that assesses variations in institutional ability. He then powerfully demonstrates the value of this analytical framework by using it to examine important contemporary issues ranging from tort reform to constitution-making.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Counsel for the United States James Eisenstein, 1978
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Who's Who in America Marquis Who's Who, Inc, 2002
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Constitutional Construction Keith E. Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics and the Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Politics Keith E Whittington, 2009-06-01 This book argues that the Constitution has a dual nature. The first aspect, on which legal scholars have focused, is the degree to which the Constitution acts as a binding set of rules that can be neutrally interpreted and externally enforced by the courts against government actors. This is the process of constitutional interpretation. But according to Keith Whittington, the Constitution also permeates politics itself, to guide and constrain political actors in the very process of making public policy. In so doing, it is also dependent on political actors, both to formulate authoritative constitutional requirements and to enforce those fundamental settlements in the future. Whittington characterizes this process, by which constitutional meaning is shaped within politics at the same time that politics is shaped by the Constitution, as one of construction as opposed to interpretation. Whittington goes on to argue that ambiguities in the constitutional text and changes in the political situation push political actors to construct their own constitutional understanding. The construction of constitutional meaning is a necessary part of the political process and a regular part of our nation's history, how a democracy lives with a written constitution. The Constitution both binds and empowers government officials. Whittington develops his argument through intensive analysis of four important cases: the impeachments of Justice Samuel Chase and President Andrew Johnson, the nullification crisis, and reforms of presidential-congressional relations during the Nixon presidency.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Gun Violence in America Alexander DeConde, 2003 An in-depth analysis of the folklore surrounding gun use and the state of the debate in today's political climate.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance Benjamin van Rooij, D. Daniel Sokol, 2022-08-04 Compliance has become key to our contemporary markets, societies, and modes of governance across a variety of public and private domains. While this has stimulated a rich body of empirical and practical expertise on compliance, thus far, there has been no comprehensive understanding of what compliance is or how it influences various fields and sectors. The academic knowledge of compliance has remained siloed along different disciplinary domains, regulatory and legal spheres, and mechanisms and interventions. This handbook bridges these divides to provide the first one-stop overview of what compliance is, how we can best study it, and the core mechanisms that shape it. Written by leading experts, chapters offer perspectives from across law, regulatory studies, management science, criminology, economics, sociology, and psychology. This volume is the definitive and comprehensive account of compliance.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: South Carolina Baptists, 1670-1805 Leah Townsend, 1974 Baptist Churches of South Carolina and list of Baptists.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Report of the Constitution Project's Task Force on Detainee Treatment, Abridged Edition Constitution Project (Georgetown Public Policy Institute). Task Force on Detainee Treatment, Constitution Project (Georgetown Public Policy Institute), Neil Lewis, Kent Eiler, Katherine Hawkins, Alka Pradhan, 2013-04-16 The Constitution Project's Task Force on Detainee Treatment is an independent, bipartisan, blue-ribbon panel charged with examining the federal government's policies and actions related to the capture, detention and treatment of suspected terrorists during the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations. The project was undertaken with the belief that it was important to provide an account as authoritative and accurate as possible of how the United States treated, and continues to treat, people held in our custody as the nation mobilized to deal with a global terrorist threat.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Statistics of the State of Georgia George White, 1849
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Western North Carolina John Preston Arthur, 1996 From the introduction to the appendix, this volume is filled with interesting information. Covering seventeen counties—Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Buncombe, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson, Macon, Madison, Mitchell, Swain, Transylvania, Watauga, and Yancey—the author spent about ten years searching and gathering materials.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Life and Times of Colonel Richard M. Johnson of Kentucky Leland Winfield Meyer, 1932 Follows the life of Richard M. Johnson from his early life through his political career, service in the War of 1812, and his service as Vice President of the United States.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Complications and Quandaries in the ICT Sector Ashish Bharadwaj, Vishwas H. Devaiah, Indranath Gupta, 2017-10-27 This book is open access under a CC BY 4.0 license. With technology standards becoming increasingly common, particularly in the information and communications technology (ICT) sector, the complexities and contradictions at the interface of intellectual property law and competition law have emerged strongly. This book talks about how the regulatory agencies and courts in the United States, European Union and India are dealing with the rising allegations of anti-competitive behaviour by standard essential patent (SEP) holders. It also discusses the role of standards setting organizations / standards developing organizations (SSO/SDO) and the various players involved in implementing the standards that influence practices and internal dynamics in the ICT sector. This book includes discussions on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing terms and the complexities that arise when both licensors and licensees of SEPs differ on what they mean by “fair”, “reasonable” and “non-discriminatory” terms. It also addresses topics such as the appropriate royalty base, calculation of FRAND rates and concerns related to FRAND commitments and the role of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in collaborative standard setting process. This book provides a wide range of valuable information and is a useful tool for graduate students, academics and researchers.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: A Slaveholders' Union George William Van Cleve, 2010-10-15 After its early introduction into the English colonies in North America, slavery in the United States lasted as a legal institution until the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. But increasingly during the contested politics of the early republic, abolitionists cried out that the Constitution itself was a slaveowners’ document, produced to protect and further their rights. A Slaveholders’ Union furthers this unsettling claim by demonstrating once and for all that slavery was indeed an essential part of the foundation of the nascent republic. In this powerful book, George William Van Cleve demonstrates that the Constitution was pro-slavery in its politics, its economics, and its law. He convincingly shows that the Constitutional provisions protecting slavery were much more than mere “political” compromises—they were integral to the principles of the new nation. By the late 1780s, a majority of Americans wanted to create a strong federal republic that would be capable of expanding into a continental empire. In order for America to become an empire on such a scale, Van Cleve argues, the Southern states had to be willing partners in the endeavor, and the cost of their allegiance was the deliberate long-term protection of slavery by America’s leaders through the nation’s early expansion. Reconsidering the role played by the gradual abolition of slavery in the North, Van Cleve also shows that abolition there was much less progressive in its origins—and had much less influence on slavery’s expansion—than previously thought. Deftly interweaving historical and political analyses, A Slaveholders’ Union will likely become the definitive explanation of slavery’s persistence and growth—and of its influence on American constitutional development—from the Revolutionary War through the Missouri Compromise of 1821.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Justice on Trial Mollie Hemingway, Carrie Severino, 2019-07-09 #1 NATIONAL BESTSELLER! Justice Anthony Kennedy slipped out of the Supreme Court building on June 27, 2018, and traveled incognito to the White House to inform President Donald Trump that he was retiring, setting in motion a political process that his successor, Brett Kavanaugh, would denounce three months later as a “national disgrace” and a “circus.” Justice on Trial, the definitive insider’s account of Kavanaugh’s appointment to the Supreme Court, is based on extraordinary access to more than one hundred key figures—including the president, justices, and senators—in that ferocious political drama. The Trump presidency opened with the appointment of Neil Gorsuch to succeed the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. But the following year, when Trump drew from the same list of candidates for his nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, the justice being replaced was the swing vote on abortion, and all hell broke loose. The judicial confirmation process, on the point of breakdown for thirty years, now proved utterly dysfunctional. Unverified accusations of sexual assault became weapons in a ruthless campaign of personal destruction, culminating in the melodramatic hearings in which Kavanaugh’s impassioned defense resuscitated a nomination that seemed beyond saving. The Supreme Court has become the arbiter of our nation’s most vexing and divisive disputes. With the stakes of each vacancy incalculably high, the incentive to destroy a nominee is nearly irresistible. The next time a nomination promises to change the balance of the Court, Hemingway and Severino warn, the confirmation fight will be even uglier than Kavanaugh’s. A good person might accept that nomination in the naïve belief that what happened to Kavanaugh won’t happen to him because he is a good person. But it can happen, it does happen, and it just happened. The question is whether America will let it happen again.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Conservative Case for Class Actions Brian T. Fitzpatrick, 2019-11-01 Since the 1960s, the class action lawsuit has been a powerful tool for holding businesses accountable. Yet years of attacks by corporate America and unfavorable rulings by the Supreme Court have left its future uncertain. In this book, Brian T. Fitzpatrick makes the case for the importance of class action litigation from a surprising political perspective: an unabashedly conservative point of view. Conservatives have opposed class actions in recent years, but Fitzpatrick argues that they should see such litigation not as a danger to the economy, but as a form of private enforcement of the law. He starts from the premise that all of us, conservatives and libertarians included, believe that markets need at least some rules to thrive, from laws that enforce contracts to laws that prevent companies from committing fraud. He also reminds us that conservatives consider the private sector to be superior to the government in most areas. And the relatively little-discussed intersection of those two beliefs is where the benefits of class action lawsuits become clear: when corporations commit misdeeds, class action lawsuits enlist the private sector to intervene, resulting in a smaller role for the government, lower taxes, and, ultimately, more effective solutions. Offering a novel argument that will surprise partisans on all sides, The Conservative Case for Class Actions is sure to breathe new life into this long-running debate.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Search for Environmental Justice Paul Martin, Sadeq Z. Bigdeli, Trevor Daya-Winterbottom, Willemien du Plessis, Amanda Kennedy, 2015-07-31 This thoughtful book provides an overview of the major developments in the theory and practice of Ôenvironmental justiceÕ. It illustrates the direction of the evolution of rights of nature and exposes the diverse meanings and practical uses of the conc
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Civil Aeronautics Bd United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations, 1969
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Bench and Bar of Georgia Stephen Frank 1810?-1867 Miller, 2021-09-09 This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Allegheny Frontier Otis K. Rice, 2014-07-15 The Allegheny frontier, comprising the mountainous area of present-day West Virginia and bordering states, is studied here in a broad context of frontier history and national development. The region was significant in the great American westward movement, but Otis K. Rice seeks also to call attention to the impact of the frontier experience upon the later history of the Allegheny Highlands. He sees a relationship between its prolonged frontier experience and the problems of Appalachia in the twentieth century. Through an intensive study of the social, economic, and political developments in pioneer West Virginia, Rice shows that during the period 1730–1830 some of the most significant features of West Virginia life and thought were established. There also appeared evidences of arrested development, which contrasted sharply with the expansiveness, ebullience, and optimism commonly associated with the American frontier. In this period customs, manners, and folkways associated with the conquest of the wilderness to root and became characteristic of the mountainous region well into the twentieth century. During this pioneer period, problems also took root that continue to be associated with the region, such as poverty, poor infrastructure, lack of economic development, and problematic education. Since the West Virginia frontier played an important role in the westward thrust of migration through the Alleghenies, Rice also provides some account of the role of West Virginia in the French and Indian War, eighteenth-century land speculations, the Revolutionary War, and national events after the establishment of the federal government in 1789.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Reasoned Administration and Democratic Legitimacy Jerry L. Mashaw, 2018-09-27 Explains how administrative government maintains mutual respect among citizens, legitimates administrative government under law, and supports a realistic vision of democracy.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Energy Law Alexandra B. Klass, Hannah J. Wiseman, 2019-12-05 This book has several groups of potential readers. Students and professors at law schools, undergraduate institutions, and graduate programs such as public policy, business, urban planning, and environmental studies can use the book instead of a case book or as a supplement to a case book. The material is adequately detailed to provide substantive topics that will fill an entire course or provide a more succinct description of complex issues from case books or professor-prepared readings. Attorneys, policymakers and their staff, and other individuals who encounter energy issues in their work also should find this book to be a useful introduction to the field of energy law and policy as well as a reference point for specific energy issues. The book provides a broad yet detailed understanding of the major components of energy systems, energy infrastructure, and energy markets and the laws that guide their development. It covers all major energy policy sectors including oil and gas extraction, electricity regulation, renewable energy development, and regulation of vehicles and transportation fuels. The book is timely--describing rapidly changing policy in environmental regulation such as hydraulic fracturing, planning for electric transmission lines, state carbon reduction and clean energy mandates, and natural gas and oil exports. It also places these recent developments in the context of the many long-lasting policies that created current energy infrastructure and markets.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Representing Justice Judith Resnik, Dennis Edward Curtis, 2011-01-01 A remnant of the Renaissance : the transnational iconography of justice -- Civic space, the public square, and good governance -- Obedience : the judge as the loyal servant of the state -- Of eyes and ostriches -- Why eyes? : color, blindness, and impartiality -- Representations and abstractions : identity, politics, and rights -- From seventeenth-century town halls to twentieth-century courts -- A building and litigation boom in Twentieth-Century federal courts -- Late Twentieth-Century United States courts : monumentality, security, and eclectic imagery -- Monuments to the present and museums of the past : national courts (and prisons) -- Constructing regional rights -- Multi-jurisdictional premises : from peace to crimes -- From rites to rights -- Courts : in and out of sight, site, and cite -- An iconography for democratic adjudication.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Energy Law Alexandra B. Klass, Hannah J. Wiseman, 2017 This book has several groups of potential readers. Students and professors at law schools, undergraduate institutions, and graduate programs such as public policy, urban planning, and environmental studies can use the book instead of a case book or as a supplement to a case book. The material is adequately detailed to provide substantive topics that will fill an entire course or provide a more succinct description of complex issues from case books or professor-prepared readings. Attorneys, policymakers and their staff, and other individuals who encounter energy issues in their work also should find this book to be a useful introduction to the field of energy law and policy as well as a reference point for specific energy issues. The book provides a broad yet detailed understanding of the major components of energy systems, energy infrastructure, and energy markets and the laws that guide their development. It covers all major energy policy sectors including oil and gas extraction, electricity regulation, renewable energy development, and regulation of vehicles and transportation fuels. It will serve as a valuable resource for students of law, business, and public policy as well as practicing attorneys. The book is timely--describing rapidly changing policy in environmental regulation such as hydraulic fracturing, planning for electric transmission lines, and natural gas and oil exports. It also places these recent developments in the context of the many long-lasting policies that created current energy infrastructure and markets.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Cases Adjudged United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit), United States. Court of Appeals (District of Columbia Circuit)., 1989
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Reconstruction Eric Foner, 2011-12-13 From the preeminent historian of Reconstruction (New York Times Book Review), a newly updated edition of the prize-winning classic work on the post-Civil War period which shaped modern America, with a new introduction from the author. Eric Foner's masterful treatment of one of the most complex periods of American history (New Republic) redefined how the post-Civil War period was viewed. Reconstruction chronicles the way in which Americans—black and white—responded to the unprecedented changes unleashed by the war and the end of slavery. It addresses the ways in which the emancipated slaves' quest for economic autonomy and equal citizenship shaped the political agenda of Reconstruction; the remodeling of Southern society and the place of planters, merchants, and small farmers within it; the evolution of racial attitudes and patterns of race relations; and the emergence of a national state possessing vastly expanded authority and committed, for a time, to the principle of equal rights for all Americans. This smart book of enormous strengths (Boston Globe) remains the standard work on the wrenching post-Civil War period—an era whose legacy still reverberates in the United States today.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Anarchist Periodicals in English Published in the United States (1833-1955) Ernesto A. Longa, 2010 Surveying 94 newspapers edited and published throughout North America, each periodical examined includes the following information: title; issues examined; editor; publication information, such as location and frequency of publication, contributors, features, and subjects; and preceding and succeeding titles.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Goodriches Dane Starbuck, 2001 When local author Dane Starbuck set out several years ago to write the biography of Pierre Goodrich, scion of one of Indiana's most prominent twentieth-century families, he soon discovered that it was impossible to really understand Pierre Goodrich without also closely examining his family. Starbuck's years of research culminated in The Goodriches: An American Family, now available from Liberty Fund. This work is a revealing window into the founding ideals of both Indiana and our country, and how our founders meant these ideals to be lived. The Goodriches: An American Family begins with the birth of James P. Goodrich in 1864 and continues through the death of his son Pierre F. Goodrich in 1973. As the story of two fascinating and fiercely individualistic men, it is compelling reading, but as author Dane Starbuck says in the preface, ''the later chapters of this book are as much a social commentary on American life in the twentieth century as parts of a biography of two accomplished men. In his foreword to The Goodriches: An American Family, James M. Buchanan, Nobel laureate in economics and celebrated Liberty Fund author, says, The Indiana Goodriches are an American family whose leading members, James and Pierre, helped to shape the American century. . . . This biography makes us recognize what is missing from the millennial setting in which we find ourselves. We have lost the 'idea of America, ' both as a motivation for action and as a source of emotional self-confidence. We have lost that which the Goodriches possessed. What did the Goodrich family possess which made them so unique? A belief in the power of knowledge, the importance of education, and a strong work ethic combined to imbue the Goodrich family with a distinctive sense of civic duty. James Goodrich served as governor of Indiana from 1917 to 1921 and as adviser to Presidents Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover. During his eulogy of James Goodrich, the Reverend Gustav Papperman explained, The Governor felt that he had been given talents that were a trust, that he was to administer them faithfully. . . . According to author Dane Starbuck, Education was a large part of the Goodriches' work ethos. . . . The family viewed education as a process by virtue of which the individual remained informed, made better business decisions, learned the importance of citizenship, and was given an opportunity for individual self-improvement. Therefore, work and education became the centerpieces of the Goodrich family's ethical and practical life. In later years, Pierre Goodrich, successful businessman and entrepreneur, would set aside a portion of his estate to found Liberty Fund because he believed that the principles of liberty on which our nation was founded need to be constantly kept before the public.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Bulletin of Yale University Yale Law School, 1900
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Ethics in the Practice of Law Geoffrey C. Hazard, 1978-01-01 This text focuses on lawyers ethics. Topics include the nature of the adversary system, conflicts of interest, the problem of identifying the client in an institutional setting, and the question of the attorney's moral responsibility for client conduct.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Southern Literature from 1579-1895 Louise Manly, 1973
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: OLD MERCERSBURG WOMAN'S CLUB OF. MERCERSBURG, 2018
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: The Adams-Jefferson Letters John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Abigail Adams, 1959 A collection of 380 letters, written between 1777-1826, with notes and chapter introductions that relate them to the history of the American republic. For other editions, see Author Catalog.
  judge scott mcafee federalist society: Who's who in American Law , 2005